Asklemmy

45273 readers

1111 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

211

Can Elon Musk be charged with domestic terrorism? (www.fbi.gov)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SuperCub@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

From FBI link: In using the term Domestic Terrorism, DHS looks to the Homeland Security Act definition of terrorism, 6 U.S.C. 101(18), which is substantially similar but not identical to the title 18 definition. That provision defines terrorism as any activity that:

• Involves an act that:

Is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive of critical infrastructure or key resources; and
Is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State or other subdivision of the United States; and

• Appears to be intended:

To intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
To influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
To affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Edit: OP has cleaned up the formatting accordingly.

I'm gonna try to clean up the formatting to make the original post easier to read...

• Involves an act that:

Is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive of critical infrastructure or key resources; and
Is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State or other subdivision of the United States; and

• Appears to be intended:

To intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
To influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
To affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry, there might be something wrong with my Lemmy client. I tried editing it but it doesn't seem to fix it.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your edit is mostly fixed now, at least going by how it renders here on my end running Jerboa. It appears you just missed a space after your first asterisk bullet mark.

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks homie