this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
646 points (98.8% liked)

Reddit

13744 readers
1217 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Something big is happening, as Reddit seems to have purged literally every NSFW sub they know. Reason is always "unmoderated" despite some of the banned subreddits being fully moderated.


Edit: seems to have been a bug in automation (thanks @lefty7283@lemmy.world):

https://old.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/1ii67mt/_/mb3fewv

It's still a good reminder on how quickly a community (or communities) thousands of people enjoy and in some cases rely upon can disappear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Eh no need to get tin foil hat, imho.

[–] almost1337@lemm.ee 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, one has to ask why they were setting up automated banning of these subreddits in the first place.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

The reason for all of them was unmoderated. So it seems to me like they have/are testing a method to auto ban unmoderated subs. Not that crazy, imho.

[–] Clasm@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Then why weren't there loads more "unmoderated" subs of different categorize blocked?

If it was just a glitch, I suspect that the affected subreddits would better represent a random distribution of topics than what we witnessed.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

A glitch is when something doesn't work as you expect it to. I don't know why you'd suspect any kind of behaviour from a glitch. Glitches can do all kinds of crazy shit.

To be clear, I'm speculating on what tool they may actually be working on.

[–] Clasm@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm aware of what a glitch is. What I'm saying is that they are already targeting these specific subs regardless of their moderation status. The only 'glitch' here was that they got caught pushing an agenda.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You countered the assertion that it was a glitch with "well then why..." and presented a scenario you'd expect to see if it really were a glitch. I tried explaining why that doesn't make any sense.

Have a good day.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

they are saying Reddit is lying, hard to understand?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago

I understand what they were saying and I tried to explain why their case for it didn't make sense to me.

[–] Jomn@jlai.lu 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If they are really testing things like that, it's quite worrying that they did it on the production server...

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago

Huffman was probably in a huge hurry to gargle Elon's balls.

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

subs like r/boobs are unmodded?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hence the glitch. A glitch is when doesn't perform as expected or desired.

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I see, I assumed trans_surgeries wasn't a nsfw sub, so I was weary of why it would be in the list with the rest.

[–] SecondaryAnnetagonist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

NSFW doesn't mean literal porn it means "what would be potentially catastrophic for the prudes at work to see on my screen out of the corner of their eye".

As it turns out, anyones' loins falls under that definition because vivimos en una sociedad.

And taking a scythe to anything with that tag is much simpler than actually being an arbiter of what is and isn't "degenerate" porn for the sake of this batshit prudish regime.