this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
123 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

49544 readers
1441 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How are they so small and underfunded? My hobby home servers and internet connection satisfy their simple requirements

[–] colournoun@beehaw.org 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

800TB of bandwidth per month?

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's ~2.4Gbit/s. There are multiple residential ISPs in my area offering 10Gbit/s up for around $40/month, so even if we assume the bandwidth is significantly oversubscribed a single cheap residential internet plan should be able to handle that bandwidth no problem (let alone a for a datacenter setup which probably has 100Gbit/s links or faster)

[–] synicalx@lemm.ee 1 points 11 minutes ago

If you do 800TB in a month on any residential service you’re getting fair use policy’ed before the first day is over, sadly.

[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That averages out to around 300 megabytes per second. No way anyone has that at home comercially.

One of the best comercial fiber connections i ever saw will provide 50 megabytes per second upload, best effort that is.

No way in hell you can satisfy that bandwidth requirement at home. Lets not mention that they need 3 nodes with such bw.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah, thats almost 150% more than my (theoretical) bandwidth at home (Gbps but I live alone & just don't want to pay much), and that is just assuming constant workload (peaks must be massive).

This is indeed considerate, yet hopefully solvable. It certainly is from the link perspective.

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

50MB/s is like 0.4Gbit/s. Idk where you are, but in Switzerland you can get a symmetric 10Gbit/s fiber link for like 40 bucks a month as a residential customer. Considering 100Gbit/s and even 400Gbit/s links are already widely deployed in datacenter environments, 300MB/s (or 2.4Gbit/s) could easily be handled even by a single machine (especially since the workload basically consists of serving static files).

[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

So I have to move to Swiss then, got it.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably not one person, but that could be distributed.

Like folding at home :D

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On my current internet plan I can move about 130TB/month and that's sufficent for me, but I could upgrade plan to satisfy the requirement

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Your home server might have the required bandwidth but not requisite the infra to support server load (hundreds of parallel connections/downloads).

Bandwidth is only one aspect of the problem.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

Ten gig fibre for internal networking, enterprise SFP+ network hardware, big meaty 72 TB FreeBSD ZFS file server with plenty of cache, backup power supply and UPS

The tech they require really isn't expensive anymore