this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30738 readers
53 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for that perspective. It seems to be somewhat similar and thankless to when I get tasked with taking microbio samples from the machines to check for contamination and then get grumpy department leads because the analysis results show over and over again that their cleaning procedure is inefficient.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What, can't you just... idk, check better to see how clean it actually is? That can't be right, you probably got your samples contaminated. Were those really from that machine? Maybe you got them mixed up. Well you're really itching to find contaminants, aren't you? Of course you'll find something if you look hard enough...

I don't know how your business works, so I'm trying to project the managers I know onto it - am I so far off that I look like a manager?

[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hahaha the production lead actually suggested that I might have been sick and coughed germs onto the sample sponge or that the sponges themselves were already contaminated during manufacturing, because every single sample showed high counts of pseudomonas.

Maybe instead she should start listening to us when we tell her that production equipment from 1970 might not be sufficient to run a food production with the hygiene requirements of today. But no, replacing that would cost more money than just taking samples over and over until the results are low enough (probably because by the 37th swab I cleaned the surface better than the production workers)

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

Couldn't you just add up the germs found in successive swabs to the total and increase the total count with each test?

(I assume you have certain testing and evaluation standards you're bound to, so that's a "No", but I like the idea of the results getting worse rather than better)

What would newer equipment do differently to make it less prone to hygiene issues?