this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
456 points (99.4% liked)

World News

40161 readers
4111 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

European Union officials propose holding retailers such as Temu, Shein, and Amazon Marketplace accountable for dangerous and illegal products sold to consumers.

A draft proposal requires platforms to provide customs data before goods enter the EU, enabling authorities to inspect shipments and enforce safety standards.

New reforms shift import responsibilities from individual buyers to online platforms, mandating collection of duties, VAT, and compliance with comprehensive strict EU regulations.

Officials warn that these changes could improve consumer safety and reduce harmful imports, while prompting legal debates and challenges for e-commerce firms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Uber: We just facilitate rides between our “independent contractors” and customers. We’re not liable for anything that happens

Amazon: We just facilitate purchases between our “independent retailers” and customers. We’re not liable for anything that happens

AirBnB: We just facilitate rentals between our “independent landlords” and customers. We’re not liable for anything that happens

It’s nice to see the first steps in destroying this completely BS business model. Hopefully this can start a domino effect.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The whole tech ethos seems to be:

  1. Find something we decided 100 years ago should be illegal, despite being profitable
  2. Find a way to use digital technologies to repackage it “legally”
  3. Put the pedal to the metal: make enough money before the public asks for regulation that you can write the regulations yourself
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

I believe it's called Regulatory Arbitrage - using the time gap between a new technology appearing that allows new ways of doing something which have yet to be Regulated and Lawmakers getting around to regulating it, to run an unregulated (yet legal) business - and indeed as you pointed out it has been the most common business model of the largest startups since at least the 2010s.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago

Yeah. The whole "gig economy" model is based on companies being able to shrug off all the risk. It really needs to die.

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

And airbnb charging insane "service fees" in the process. There is a lawsuit in my country being formed against them for this.

[–] Eril@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

Never thought about it like this. Damn this approach does not make sense at all😵