this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
-6 points (35.0% liked)
Asklemmy
44697 readers
1784 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How to address superintelligence, if that is actually something we realistically face:
Make creating an unlicensed AI with over a certain threshold to be a capital offense.
Regulate the field of artificial intelligence as heavily as we do nuclear science and nuclear weapons development.
Have strict international treaties on model size and capability limitations.
Have inspection regimes in place to allow international monitoring of any electricity usage over a certain threshold.
Use satellites to track anomalous large power use across the globe (monitored via waste heat) and thoroughly investigate any large unexplained energy use.
Target the fabs. High powered chips should be licensed and tracked like nuclear materials.
Make clear that a nuclear first strike is a perfectly acceptable response to a nation state trying to create AGI.
Anyone who says this technology simply cannot be regulated is a fool. We're talking models that require hundreds of megawatts or more to run and giant data centers full of millions of dollars worth of chips. There's only a handful of companies on the planet producing the hardware for these systems. The idea that we can't regulate such a thing is ridiculous.
I'm sorry, but I put the survival of the human race above your silly science project. If I have to put every person on this planet with a degree in computer science into a hole in the ground to save the human race, that is a sacrifice I am willing to make. Hell, I'll go full Dune and outlaw computers all together, go back to pen and paper for everything, before I condone AGI.
We can't control this technology? Balderdash. It's created by human beings. And human beings can be killed.
So, how do we deal with ASI? You put anyone trying to create it deep in the ground. This is self defense at a species level. Sacrificing a few thousand madmen who think they're going to summon a benevolent god to serve them is simple self-defense. It's OK to kill cultists who are trying to summon a demon.