this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
75 points (97.5% liked)

News

24249 readers
4931 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

🤢

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (10 children)
[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Disappointed to say the least…

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

considers

I don't know. I'd say that it's probably pretty reasonable, if you figure what their job is -- producing understandable material.

checks

In terms of authority, Denali is in the US. The federal government did the renaming from "Mount McKinley" to "Denali" in 2015. I don't think that generally there was dispute that the federal government was the authority on the name of the thing then.

In terms of familiarity, Mount McKinley's been known as "Mount McKinley" for quite a while; most Americans are going to know what the thing is. I hadn't paid attention to the spat over it, and when I first heard "Denali", thought that it was a different mountain.

So (1) the administration probably legitimately is the globally-authoritative source on the name, and (2) calling it "Mount McKinley" won't produce confusion, even with people who would rather that it be called "Denali".

On the other hand, the Gulf of Mexico is a major international geographical feature frequently referred to abroad. Very little of it is within US borders. Some countries are surrounded by it, and the term is frequently used abroad -- as the AP mentions. It's not very likely that any other countries are going to change their day-to-day use over it, whatever Trump says. All Americans know it as the Gulf of Mexico, and I doubt that most are going to change the term they use. So continuing to call it the "Gulf of Mexico" is probably the most-understandable approach; indicating parenthetically that it's been designated the "Gulf of America" indicates that the official term is this, though they aren't using it.

Like, the AP's job isn't "participate in a culture war on one side or another", but "get copy out that people can understand".

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I will say, though -- expanding the discussion past the AP's decision -- that while I don't think that the AP's stance is unreasonable...the same might not be said of the people who wanted the rename.

A major argument being made by a number of folks that support Trump that states should be given more deference and not run roughshod over by the federal government -- okay, fair enough.

But the mountain is located in Alaska. It looks like Alaska prefers "Denali", and, in fact, its lower legislative house just passed a resolution objecting to the rename:

https://alaskapublic.org/news/politics/alaska-legislature/2025-01-27/alaska-house-resolution-urges-trump-administration-to-keep-the-name-denali

The naming of the thing "Mount McKinley" was done to honor President McKinley. And, okay, the federal government's gotta have something somewhere if it wants to do something like that, and good odds are that it's in some state's territory. But I very much suspect that of all the things that one can find in the US, it's probably possible to find something somewhere noteworthy that could be named by the federal government to honor President McKinley without running into objections from the state.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denali

The Alaska Board of Geographic Names changed the name of the mountain to Denali in 1975, which was how it was called locally.[11][32] However, a request in 1975 from the Alaska state legislature to the United States Board on Geographic Names to do the same at the federal level was blocked by Ohio congressman Ralph Regula, whose district included McKinley's home town of Canton.[33]

My guess is that Ohio is probably okay with having something in its borders named after President McKinley, for example.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good on you for doing some more research. Imo Denali and the Gulf of Mexico are like Mount Vesuvius and the Mediterranean Sea, i.e., the names are eminently suitable and essentially permanent. I'm going to expound on this at length, specifically in regard to Denali, because the case for the Gulf of Mexico is so incredibly one-sided and obvious. The case for Denali is also one-sided, but it's much less well known.

To clarify, the name didn't originate in honor of President McKinley, it was created while he was still running for president.

In 1896, a gold prospector named it McKinley as political support for then-presidential candidate William McKinley, who became president the following year.

In other words, the mountain which had been locally known as Denali for centuries was arbitrarily utilized as a political pawn to boost the candidacy of McKinley, who turned out to be a mediocre president at best.

Also, it wasn't officially recognized as such until 20 years later by Democrat Woodrow Wilson, potentially as a conciliatory political maneuver towards the Republican party, which was dominant under the Fourth Party System. Little known fact, from 1869 through 1933, there were 11 Republican presidents and only 2 Democratic ones. This is somewhat misleading because Grover Cleveland was elected twice and the Republicans had a couple deaths in office, but still drives home their political dominance at the time.

Speaking of which, William McKinley was assassinated by an anarchist by the name of Leon Czolgosz, who appears to me a significantly more sympathetic figure than our contemporary Luigi, whom I personally find quite lame and reprehensible, but apparently the rest of you consider to be some kind of folk hero 🙄

A few notes about the circumstances and trial of this anarchist. See if you notice any parallels between his situation and ours.

Quotes from wikipedia

Czolgosz believed there was a great injustice in American society, an inequality which allowed the wealthy to enrich themselves by exploiting the poor. He concluded that the reason for this was the structure of government. About this time, he learned of the assassination of a leader in Europe, King Umberto I of Italy, who had been shot dead by anarchist Gaetano Bresci on July 29, 1900. Bresci told the press that he had decided to take matters into his own hands for the sake of the common man.

Lewis and his co-counsel called no witnesses, which Lewis in his closing argument attributed to Czolgosz's refusal to cooperate with them. In his 27-minute address to the jury, Lewis took pains to praise McKinley.

Scott Miller, author of The President and the Assassin, notes that the closing argument was more calculated to defend the attorney's "place in the community, rather than an effort to spare his client the electric chair".

His brother asked him "Who got you into this scrape?" to which Czolgosz responded "No one. Nobody had anything to do with it but me." His brother said it was unlike him and was not how he was raised. When asked by his brother if he wanted the priests to come back, Czolgosz said, "No, damn them. Don't send them here again. I don't want them," and "Don't you have any praying over me when I am dead. I don't want it. I don't want any of their damned religion."

Czolgosz's last words were: "I killed the President because he was the enemy of the good people – the good working people. I am not sorry for my crime. I am sorry I could not see my father." Czolgosz was electrocuted by three jolts, each of 1,800 volts, in Auburn Prison on October 29, 1901, forty-five days after McKinley's death.


The context which I have just provided should be reason enough to refuse the name Mount McKinley, based on the sentiments that have been superficially expressed on Lemmy and social media in general of late.

However, the fact that local Alaskans never stopped calling it Denali, and indeed successfully petitioned to have it officially renamed Denali in 1975, is even more damning. As per the Denali Wikipedia article

Indigenous names for Denali can be found in seven different Alaskan languages. The names fall into two categories. To the south of the Alaska Range in the Dena'ina and Ahtna languages the mountain is known by names that are translated as 'big mountain'. To the north of the Alaska Range in the Lower Tanana, Koyukon, Upper Kuskokwim, Holikachuk, and Deg Xinag languages the mountain is known by names that are translated as 'the high one', 'the tall one' (Koyukon, Lower and Middle Tanana, Upper Kuskokwim, Deg Xinag, and Holikachuk).

All of these names are essentially different pronunciations of Denali

Asked about the importance of the mountain and its name, Will Mayo, former president of the Tanana Chiefs Conference, an organization that represents 42 Athabaskan tribes in the Alaskan interior, said: "It's not one homogeneous belief structure around the mountain, but we all agree that we're all deeply gratified by the acknowledgment of the importance of Denali to Alaska's people."

In conclusion, Trump can go fuck himself in his fat fucking ass.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

amazing comment on a top notch thread!

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

But not surprised.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 1 points 2 days ago

I think their take is pretty pragmatic. It makes sense since the AP is an American news outlet.

load more comments (6 replies)