this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
439 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

61456 readers
6120 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
439
Knowing less about AI makes people more open to having it in their lives – new research (theconversation.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by noodlejetski@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The rapid spread of artificial intelligence has people wondering: who’s most likely to embrace AI in their daily lives? Many assume it’s the tech-savvy – those who understand how AI works – who are most eager to adopt it.

Surprisingly, our new research (published in the Journal of Marketing) finds the opposite. People with less knowledge about AI are actually more open to using the technology. We call this difference in adoption propensity the “lower literacy-higher receptivity” link.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That toaster is what AI is. If it's machine learning, it's AI. If I make a toilet that uses a shitty-ass single-layer perceptron to decide when to flush, that's an AI-powered toilet even if it's a worthless piece of crap. You can be disenchanted with it as a gimmick all you want (I am too), but it falls under AI the same way it has since the 1950s. The marketing way of referring to things you just showed me entirely comports with the academic one provided what the label says is true.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

You are technically correct and yet you are missing the original point that people expect the super-intelligent AGI of science fiction when they hear the term, no matter how much all those lesser forms are AI too by the definition of the scientific field.