The claim that the comment "is slop" might overlook socialism and the role of education in class struggle. According to Marxism, socialism is about dismantling class structures and empowering the working class to control production and governance. Education under socialism should awaken revolutionary consciousness, not simply train workers to serve the system.

Marx warned that the ruling class controls both production and ideas to maintain power. A true socialist education system would encourage people to challenge these structures, not support them.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't like accusing people of being bots, but damn is this comment written in chatgpt's writing style.

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some users keep claiming the theory is just "AI slop" which is disheartening. I've already replied to a few.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I see, if you are not a native English speaking, then I apologise (this is partly why I don't like bot accusations).

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem isn't just with the style, it's with the actual content and meaning though. What makes it AI slop is that there is no coherent logic behind the statements. It's like somebody asked a LLM to write up why China isn't socialist and then pasted it here.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, to be fair, I've seen more substanceless paragraphs from liberals.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

also true

[–] tiredturtle@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I do understand the concern in today's era