The issue is, genocide deniers are very keen to dispute any readily available facts - Holocaust, Armenian Genocide, Holodomor, etc deniers, along with flat earthers and other far-fetched conspiracy believers are willing to reject swathes of evidence and released documents that show intent and execution; I could link you interviews with Uyghurs saying they were forceably steralised or reeducayed from respected sources (and am happy to) but it seems like you've already made your mind up so will just be selectively blind when reading them

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A simple "no" would have sufficed.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thanks for proving my point that you reject even being offered evidence because you don't want to see something that challenges your worldview.

I could've spent time compiling a list, but you'd either ignore it or say it's a biased source because it's non-chinese or something.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I asked for evidence and you went into a rant with excuses for why you won't provide it lmao.

Stop grandstanding about the moral stand you're taking by believing blood libel about the yellow peril without the slightest resistance and no burden of proof.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Compile me a list that doesn't include Adrian zenz as a source.