this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
389 points (97.3% liked)
Technology
61227 readers
6184 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
??? I only see people talking about the negative of both of these on lemmy. Maybe reddit, sure, I have no idea there, but on lemmy??
I don't know what you're talking about.
I have never seen a positive post about openai get upvotes on lemmy, not even when they started.
I have never seen a positive post about elon musk on lemmy that got upvoted..
Yeah but it certainly doesn't mean it does exist just because you said so.
Something stinks.
I did prove him wrong, I searched his entire post history and found nothing.
I even volunteered to do it for him in multiple posts.
see: https://lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz/post/51512808/16473279
https://lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz/post/51512808/16473329
The post going through his post history was removed by mods. Check the modlog, he's lying.
So, I dunno what you're on about.
He's lying. About his experience on Lemmy about AI.
Okay, dude.
FWIW, you do not seem interested in an honest discussion, merely arguing in bad faith or trolling.
As an outsider in this discussion, who just read it now, what are you talking about??
You got 1 single question: show some examples of people being positive about AI/OpenAI on lemmy, something you said is very common. The one asking about it even did their best to find them themselves, but can't, so is asking you since you seem to come across it all the time.
And then you're like "i don't owe you anything, and i'll reply 50 times to you, but not take the minute it should take me to give a single example of what i was talking about (something i say is/was very common here)"...
If there's someone looking bad in this situation, it's you dude... The question communist asked is very normal in an honest discussion, and even more so after he did the effort to find it himself, and showed he did the effort.
If there's this pro AI community on lemmy, plenty of people would love to see it and maybe see what their views are. It sounds genuinely interesting if it exists, but for some reason you mention it, and when someone asks "where are these posts? i did my best finding them, but can't", you're like "no, stop harrassing me, i said it exists, but i'm not going to show you".
"Known troll" source??
check my modlog... then yours
I did because you lied
proof I'm a known troll?
do you want me to prove you are? It'd be very easy.
Ah, now he's a well known troll.
Now i don't know much about the users here, so could be he's a troll. But i don't see him as trolling you in this discussion, he asked a good faith question, and you go completely off the rails...
The proof that would be required would be you calling out openai and people defending them. I mean, that's just blindingly obvious you know. The few times i referenced something i did in the past in a discussion, i linked my previous posts showing that, otherwise i could claim anything. It just seems like the most basic etiquette in a discussion. You said people were defending openAI here on lemmy when you were calling them out. And now people are curious about this and you're like "i'll never show you".
I really don't get how that's so difficult for you. Great that you saw the openai bullshit coming from a mile away, but that doesn't mean you have to act this ridiculous when someone is curious to the context and asks you for an example when they did the effort to find such an example and couldn't...
And to not be too hypocritical XD. Here's an example of me linking to a previous post when i thought it matter to show i was saying what i was saying before more information about a subject came to light: https://old.reddit.com/r/TrackMania/comments/njq0q0/lots_of_people_have_been_saying_that_he_just_made/gz9it8s/
So just show him an example, if he then continues antagonizing you, call him out for it and for moving the goalposts etc... you could have solved this in no time, i really don't get the point you're trying to make... I'll show this guy who i claim to be a troll by being a troll myself, even though i could prove him actually being a troll with far less effort than that.
That'll show the internet how serious and not a troll i am...
I don't know why your brain got stuck in this mode, but maybe try to snap out of it...
Mods deleted proof that there's nothing like that in their post history for some reason even though anyone can do it
go to their profile, search ai, sort by upvotes, find nothing resembling what they're saying
https://lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz/search?q=ai&type=All&listingType=All&creatorId=18756960&page=5&sort=TopAll
i said on lemmy twice. Goalpost shifted.
Weird that you bothered to write that... odd coping mechanism for being called out for lying.
would've been less effort to give an example.
You realize writing that proved that you are in fact the one who cares about getting the last response in... right?