this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46115 readers
202 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I asked a question. I received a fallacy sandwich in return. There's no point in investing further.

Simply naming fallacies isn't teaching.

unsupported

The point of learning fallacies isn't so that you can just name them and feel like you've made a point.

strawman

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

None of your assertions have been supported

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

unsupported

How do you not choke on your irony?

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

With well-reasoned and nuanced principles supported by vast experience.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

With well-reasoned and nuanced principles supported by vast experience.

Unsupported

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The point of teaching is sharing knowledge, not just poking holes in whatever argument you can (intentional hyperbole, not strawman)

The point of learning fallacies isn't so that you can just name them and feel like you've made a point.

strawman

Instead of just "strawman, therefore you're wrong" and leaving it at that, how about you explain what was incorrect in that statement. That way you become more understood, and everyone understands you more.

This isn't a courtroom debate. This isn't a debate you "win" or "lose". This is a debate where everyone should be trying to understand each other, so that everyone ends up better off by the end. This sort of debate is a cooperative thing, not competitive.

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The audience I wish to reach doesn't need their hand held as a child.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who do you think you're actually reaching?

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's by far the best question I've been asked in this thread. However, satisfying your curiosity would require me to break a well-reasoned commitment I've already made to others.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm reminded of children in grade school who "I know what that means, I'm just not going to explain it to you."

Okay. You're a lot of talking for someone who doesn't want to say anything.

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

I'm reminded of children in grade school who "I know what that means, I'm just not going to explain it to you."

Yes. In this endeavor you're beginning to understand the means I've chosen for the majority.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ad hominem. How ironic, who could have expected this! Blocked lmao.

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A. I hate to do this, but

The audience I wish to reach doesn't need their hand held as a child

Strawman, saying that this is about "leading people like they're children" not "clear and effective communication as equals"

B. What I'm talking about is proactively sharing your views, both to save time on questioning and to fill gaps that others would have never thought to ask about. Please, tell me why this isn't a needed part of discussion.

[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

I need not accommodate everyone.