this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
370 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
3555 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Automotive research firm finds that Tesla has higher frequency of deadly accidents than any other car brand

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I believe you, but do you have any data to support your claim?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -4 points 9 hours ago

What specifically do you want a source for?

Because I said a couple things, and you were vague so I have to guess.

And it could legitimately be any of the sentences I typed.

A good way to be sure you're asking a question that can be answered is quoting what you're referencing:

FSD not noticing something and driving straight into it won’t react itll just act like what it’s about to hit isn’t there right up until the collusion.

But I mean, that's just physics...

Applying brakes before a crash would (well I guess should) obviously lead to a crash with less force.

Anyways, if you can tell me what exactly you want a source for and what claim you're even talking about. I can probably find something for you. But it's not like I had to go look at data in the instant to reference before making that comment. So I have to go find whatever your asking me for.

This would have all happened a lot faster if you just googled what you doubted. I mean, by now you may have already done that.

So I'm glad you didn't just type "source?" But what you did type was just as helpful in telling me what you wanted.