this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
543 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
59566 readers
3407 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Balls, they aint got em
Disney’s clown management refused to air a trans focused episode because of the “political climate” saying that “LGBTQ+ experience are a sensitive issue” thus catering to bigots.
To be fair, knowing Disney's track record it probably would have been as embarrassing as the short-lived super hero duo of Snowflake and Safespace...
or the Transgender Unicorn Powerpuff Girls episode
or the "Quagmire's Dad" episode of Family Guy
or the Women's Prison episode of "Lost Girl"
...Look I don't trust big name mainstream companies to touch trans voices with a 69 foot pole in a way that makes me give any reaction other than "Can you just call me a slur and be done with it? That would be less offensive at this point!"
(Though Indie platforms are a lot better at this given things like Celeste being an entire game comparing the trans experience of coming out and transitioning to climbing a mountain and Helluva Boss' actually having Millie's Sister be a likable character who is openly trans but not on a soapbox nor a punching line. Implying her existence is valid and not worth mocking OR apologizing for.)
To be even farier, choosing neutrality in times of oppression means you side with the oppressor.
Oh I suppose they don’t need our money
I think it's more trying to win political favor by spending big with the company owned by a member of the incoming presidential administration.
Or it's just wanting to market their ads on that platform and as you said, not having the balls to stick to their boycott
That seems to be what everyone involved with a political party or major corporation did... Make a big show of "We resisted him once, and we'll do it again!" then go "Okay, everyone it's time to line up and kiss Orange Man ass! Biden will you please get the ball rolling with some more of that high road crap?"