this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
27 points (82.9% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7228 readers
155 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Being progressive and wrong is the same as not being progressive. Drag has known people who said things like "I respect transsexuals' right to crossdress, but biology says it's impossible." That's not true, biology does support the existence of trans people. Those people drag knew tried to be progressive, but they failed because they didn't have the right knowledge. They should have spent more time learning so they could be progressive correctly. Their wrongness made them reactionary.
Being wrong about the mathematics of voting systems can also mean failing to be progressive, even with the best intentions. Jill Stein doesn't have good intentions, but some of her voters do. It's just that the Stein voters with good intentions have bad maths.