this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
84 points (98.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43963 readers
1513 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, back in the 1970s through the 1980s, there was a genre of low-budget films that sprung up all throughout the US, called “grindhouse” or “auction house” films. These films were typically shown in run-down theaters from the 1930s that were called “grindhouses”. These theaters were struggling to get business, and so, they often showed a wide variety of low-budget films to attract customers, which would gradually rise slowly throughout the day. They often showed double or triple features for very low prices, and some of the biggest names in cinema got their start from these “grindhouse” films, like James Cameron, who went on to make the mega-smashes “Titanic” and “Terminator”. His first work was acting in the Grindhouse film “Pirhana Part 2: The Spawning”, which was his first feature credit. And we wouldn't get a lot of big name IPs like Mad Max without these types of films, either.

Not only were these films made with a low budget, but they were also cared for less, which caused huge amounts of film grain since they were put on more cheaply made film reels to save costs. And more typically, these “grindhouse” films were often edited using only the raw film, so there would be sudden cuts or scene changes, and some scenes were even missing altogether as there are noticable blank slates where film should be. It wasn’t like a full-on Hollywood production. It was edited in a much more cheap fashion which resulted in film degrading. And that’s not even the most important part about these types of films, either. There’s something that makes them stand out more than anything else, and it is a core element of these kinds of films.

I am, of course, talking about the fact that many, if not all of these “grindhouse” films, were very exploitative in nature. In fact, mostly all of these “grindhouse” films are exploitation films. What is an “exploitation film”, you may ask? Well, it’s a film that mostly contains themes of sex, sensational violence, drug use, nudity, gore, destruction, rebellion, mayhem, and bizarre subject matter. These films are usually low quality “B movies”, and they also contained cheap thrills like car chases, or heavy amounts of blood and gore if it is a slasher film. Unfortunately, the whole subculture of “grindhouse film” would come to an end in the 1990s, and most if not all of these “grindhouse” theaters disappeared from the United States.

If you are one of the many who have seen these types of “grindhouse” films, then I need to ask you - what is your favorite? What is that one “grindhouse” film that you absolutely love? For my personal preference, it’s definitely Quentin Tarantino’s criminally underrated Grindhouse film called “Death Proof”, a movie about a murderer and former stuntman named Stuntman Mike who drives a modified 1970 Chevy Nova called Death Proof, which he uses to kill people. It has the perfect amount of both raw thrills, exploitation, and suspense, all reminiscent of the “grindhouse” era of cinema. It’s a gateway into a long, by-gone era of cinema, and it’s definitely one of Tarantino’s best and most underrated works. Definitely check it out.

Let me know your favorite “grindhouse” film down in the comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Blacula is legitimately fantastic. It's full-on a story about the lingering violence springing from European colonialism and the slave trade.

Just one example: The main character is an African prince, and his name is Mamuwalde, but when Dracula turns him, he says "I curse you with my name! You shall be called BLACULA!" For the rest of the film, no one calls him Blacula, because his name is Mamuwalde! Except there was one subtitle that slipped and read something like "BLACULA: I lost her because of you!", and I immediately thought, "Hey you subtitling asshole, his goddamn name is Mamuwalde!"

By the end of the movie I was rooting for him in the fight with the LAPD.