this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
231 points (97.1% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
422 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tekato@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In an ideal world the headline would be “Google kills Chrome by preventing users from blocking ads”.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And then what? The google funded firefox?

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes. The Google-funded Firefox that won’t take away your ability to block ads. Any other questions?

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why are they working with google to screw up our privacy?

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How are they doing that? They’re simply making money by putting Google search as the default. Changing it literally takes a few seconds.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They developed the "privacy sandbox" together. And in terms of cashflow, they depend on that google money. They're in trouble without it

[–] yoasif@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They developed the "privacy sandbox" together.

Yeah that's not true.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Chrome came up with that feature a while back. Now firefox is adding the same. And then later I learned it was a cooperative effort, just not under the same name

[–] yoasif@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

And then later I learned it was a cooperative effort, just not under the same name

Source?

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And in terms of cashflow, they depend on that google money. They're in trouble without it

That’s irrelevant. The only thing important is what they have to do for that money, which is setting Google as the default search engine. This only “hurts” you if you don’t take 15 seconds to change the default.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, yes, technically. But then again, if google decides to stop doing that firefox can't pay for it's staff or infrastructure. Really, they have an incentive to listen

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure. Until that happens, it will be the better option.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

History repeats itself.

Some Old Thing (software/website/service/whatever) becomes bad, and people get really upset. Initially, many say that SOT is going to die. Techies switch from SOT to New Great Thing. For a while, techies at NGT celebrate and pat each other on the back for making this brilliant move.

Meanwhile, normies at SOT continue to use it. They hate it at first or even complain about it, but eventually they get used to how bad SOT is. Every now and then, they hear about NGT, but they just can’t switch because reasons.

After a few years it’s clear that, SOT hasn’t died yet, but also continues to have quite a few users too. Some people end up using both, while a small group of people vow to never touch SOT ever again. SOT and NGT both continue to exist, because apparently there are enough users for both.

I’ve seen these things happen so many times, that it’s about time to point out that there’s a pattern. Just look back at any tech controversy over the past 30 years and you can see it usually follows this pattern pretty well.