Do you think Lemmy and other parts of the fediverse will eventually enshittify? I think this would be an interesting discussion to have. There currently is not financial incentive like the ones that have led centralized platforms to enshittify. But there might be in the future. Does decentralization protect against that tendency in some way?

Lemmy and Mastodon do give me the hope, that when one platform turns to shit, there will be people creating a platform that - for the time being - is not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

make your own instance then.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't have the time or interest to do that, and it wouldn't fix the underlying problem of tribalism that I'm concerned about.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then abandon the platform as doomed.

Those are your options. Open one or more accounts on one or more existing instances as an ordinary user, run your own single-user instance to federate and defederate from who you want to, or GTFO.

I've seen people grousing about this topic since I've been here "uuh uuh what if too many defederations because tankies? uuh uuh..."

This happens on or to other platforms already. Either you get the "r/popularthing" vs "r/actualpopularthing" dichotomies where if you vote red you go to one and if you vote blue you go to the other, or if you're politically extreme enough to be a problem for ad revenue you get kicked off the platform entirely and end up on the likes of Voat. Engagement algorithms already sort people into information silos, so each platform is already actually two or more that intersect only at right angles in the fifth dimension.

If pinching off the occasional Maoist or Nazi instance means I see slightly fewer reposts of the same news articles and memes everyone else reposts, I'm willing to accept those terms.

Something I think would be healthy for the Fediverse is for instances to be a bit more interest-focused rather than attempting to be general-purpose. I think that would knit a tougher non-political fabric with which to hold the fediverse together, then we can just pinch off the problematic extremists.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Look, the question was, "Do you think Lemmy and other parts of the fediverse will eventually enshittify? I think this would be an interesting discussion to have." I gave an answer explaining that I didn't think Lemmy would enshittify, but pointing out another senerio where Lemmy could collapse. Sorry if you found it too pessimistic, but if you didn't want to hear negativity, maybe this wasn't the discussion for you. Also, if your solution is, "make multiple accounts to get around defederation, start your own instance, or GTFO," that's going to be a problem for growth, because most users will pick GTFO.

Also, I think hyper-specialized instances will only exacerbate any potential schisms. Tribalism isn't necessarily political (although that is currently the central conflict on Lemmy). Admins could find divisions over rule enforcement, fediverse philosophy, or just get into good old-fashioned pissing contests. The admins on my instance recently created a real mess with the moderators of their own Vegan community, overriding their moderating decisions and then retroactively changing their own rules to justify it. Now imagine that conflict was between two instances, and you need to make a separate account just to talk about veganism. If anything, it seems like having an eclectic group of communities on each instance would be better than specializing, since admins would really have to consider whether it's worth cutting their users off from multiple diverse groups over a conflict.