this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
34 points (92.5% liked)

Watches

2076 readers
2 users here now

For watch enthusiasts to discuss everything related to watches and horology.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Akimoto@lemmy.ml
Cal@lemmy.ml
34
Fucking Time Propagation (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by pineapplelover@lemm.ee to c/watches@lemmy.ml
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Just bought the GWM 5610U-1C. It was a tough decision choosing between the DW5600 and this, ended up choosing this because the atomic time keeping is cool.

However, I'm a tad annoyed that the time doesn't perfectly match with time.gov and time.is since the atomic sync doesn't account for time propagation, so there's like a fraction of a second delay that's noticeable. Other than that, the watch is fantastic and has most features I would want. (I wish it had barometer and altimeter stuff, maybe even compass, and dive rated so I can press buttons underwater)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That would bother me too. But wouldn't they have to account for varying lag?

[โ€“] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, that's what I'm asking here. Annoyed that this watch doesn't account for time propagation from the fort collins tower to here by transmitting back and forth to see the delay. But some @Bach37strad@lemmy.world above explained that I would need a huge antenna and a bunch of radio know how to set that up so it can go to fort collins. Which I can't believe I didn't even think of.