this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
703 points (93.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7150 readers
1110 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 day ago (63 children)

In America you either one of the 2 main or a spoiler. Y'all really need ranked voting.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (44 children)

Can't get ranked choice voting with either establishment party, and I don't consider the only major leftist candidate to be a spoiler for 2 right parties.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (37 children)

Hilarious. Let me think about who I'd vote for if I was US-American. The Fascist or the at least slightly socially progressive neoliberals? It's anyone's guess really. NO. Of course the Dems, fucking obviously.

So if I was US-American and also hit in the head enough to consider voting for third party in a country with a first-past-the-post boring system, I'd not vote for the Dems as a result.

This is called the spoiler effect. This makes her a spoiler candidate, no matter her intention.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

least slightly socially progressive neoliberals? It’s anyone’s guess really. NO. Of course the Dems, fucking obviously.

What are they actually socially progressive on though? They're still supporting ICE and police state expansion, still doing tough on immigration bullshit, still presiding over migrant concentration camps, still funding and arming Israeli genocide, still rattling the saber at China, still blockading Cuba, not doing anything to protect trans people from genocide, doing exterminationist shit to homeless people in blue cities in blue states,

I could go on but you get the point.

Putting a HRC sticker on doesn't mean you're a little bit socially progressive, it means you have a PR team.

load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (60 replies)