this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
110 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
1
The Benefits of World Hunger (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The article is actually decently well written good-faith satire meant to address how poverty and hunger are inherent to capitalism as a system. The title was just too bold lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OP really should have just linked the article:

https://fee.org/articles/un-deletes-article-titled-the-benefits-of-world-hunger-was-it-real-or-satire/

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Y'all should actually read the article because it seems like it's saying something completely different from what OP is trying to make it sound like. Basically, if I understood correctly, the article was being critical of the idea that market-led solutions (i.e. capitalism fixes hunger) are better than community-driven solutions.

This paragraph seems to sum up the article pretty well:

In Kent’s view, one gathers, global hunger is not a complex problem that is being addressed by free market capitalism; it’s a moral one that requires empowering intellectuals like Kent to solve it.

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And to be clear you mean the original UN article, not the article from the libertarian think tank “Foundation for Economic Education” (“FEE”)

And the UN article link (archive) is in the comments

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I couldn't find the original UN article which is why I was referencing the FEE one. Also, while I quoted the bit about "empowered intellectuals" I assumed that was pro-capitalist cynicism towards education and community due to the heavily pro-capitalist slant in the rest of the FEE article. I kinda figured everyone else picked up on that too.

Thanks for the link! I'll have to read the original in a bit.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the original UN article

Someone linked it bellow: https://archive.is/MObDZ

The FEE article is garbage, but the original is like a broken clock, it makes a couple of valid points, but it doesn't strike me as being written by an anti capitalist, but by someone who wants to reform capitalism.