this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58458 readers
4421 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Rooting for Nintendo on this one. Palworld was dumb, you can’t just steal others’ IP without consequences. They could have made things just different enough… But they didn’t, they were dumb.

[–] Killer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Sure except they aren't being sued for IP infringement. They're getting sued for Patent infrigement.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's weird to root for a multi billion dollar corporation, especially Nintendo, even if you think Palworld is in the wrong.

I can agree that IP theft can be dumb in some cases, and Palworld is cutting it pretty close there. Nintendo sues everyone, though, even for the pettiest of reasons, and this kind of behavior shouldn't be encouraged.

Palworld isn't actually putting a dent in Nintendo's bottom line. Nintendo is just litigious against everybody, including their own fans, so of course they are going to sue a competitor.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 1 week ago

What exactly did Palworld steal? Surely you have sources for your claims

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

it's not a copyright/dmca claim, they are claiming they are violating a patent of some kind, so it's not visuals or names, I'm curious if it will be a ball object that captures them, cause like if so that's so broad that it shouldn't be able to be patented