this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
58550 readers
4708 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If only international companies who produce the most issues for the climate made significant changes to their business first.
We should all “play our part”. But assuming everyone in the world got rid of their cars and solely relied on bicycles, for example, how much impact would that really have? Compared to huge lorries on the road and shipping companies burning bunker oil?
the problem with blaming companies is none of them do this out of desire to hurt the environment. they do it to meet customer demand.
as an example imagine if we all stopped buying gas from Shell. their environmental impact would plummet...and their competitors impact would go up as we continue to buy the same amount of gas from other companies
No, they do it to increase profit.
Companies only do things for their bottom line, not for customer demand. Also, if nobody would buy gas from Shell anymore, their gas stations would just have to be rebranded to something else. Behind the scenes the oil companies are all trading with each other.
The bikes would still be shipped from india because it's cheaper. So the OPs question stays the same. Would you be willing to buy a bike that's 3 times the price because it's been built locally. Statistics show that most people wouldn't. So no, most people wouldn't change their lifestyle to combat climate change. Should they? Obviously, since living a modest life is better than burning alive or drowning. Although in all fairness, people might be more willing to spend money to combat climate change if corpocrats wouldn't be gobbling up every bit of wealth like fucking ghouls.
It would have a massive effect. Transport (car) emissions are one of the larger - and growing - sources of emissions.
And we can't hide behind "But the corporations..." because ultimately what they produce gets used by us.
So to answer your question: riding a bike when Global Capital wants you to keep buying cars and pumping oil into them is one of the best acts of defiance you can make
I call that bullshit. Newer ICE cars are more efficient and EVs are all the rage now... and you're claming cars are larger sources? Compared to trucks? Container ships? Diesel trains? Airplanes? For real?!