this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
481 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy

12572 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Knightfall@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I meant the instance itself. The server. The one who runs lemmy.ca is here in Canada with me.

It's like when playing a game; You choose servers closet to you for the lowest ping time.

The other reason I neglected to mention was I like to support local. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

[โ€“] erwan@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes a difference for a game, but it's not really significant for a website.

The server load and resources will have a much bigger impact on performances than geographic proximity.

[โ€“] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you spread that server load by selecting different servers. While what you're saying is technically true, in a practical sense if everyone picked a more local server that would be one way to achieve what you're saying.

[โ€“] MiddleKnight@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No because the population is not even close to being uniformly distributed geographically.

[โ€“] ziggurism@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

you don't need a uniform distribution. if the server distribution mirrors the population distribution (and why wouldn't it?), that will still achieve the desired effect.