this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
55 points (78.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43963 readers
1313 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s an authoritarian thing. A lot of the rebels against the USSR were communists (most notably the red navy’s rebellion at Kronstadt). It’s a shame that communism has become synonymous to much of the world with the authoritarianism of some of its’ factions.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All fo them took the Russian style communism which it self is just continuation of Russian emperial habits they inherited from Mongols.

Chinese, Koreas etc could have chose differently.

Vietnam does seem to be a bit different or we just don't know as much about their crimes.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Chinese communism seems very much to be born of a fusion of USSR and Chinese imperial styles. But one important thing to remember about communist revolutions between 1918 and the 1990s is that the USSR played a major role in a lot of them. This is where you see such things as the betrayal in Catalonia and massive splits in western leftism as Marxist-Leninists and Maoists had backing and anarchists didn’t.