this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
1237 points (95.5% liked)

Linux

48364 readers
948 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1237
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sag@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Per the graphic, it means Unix System Resources....

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I don't trust a graphic which explains /boot as "system boot loader files"...

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why? What's inaccurate about it? I have no idea and would like to learn.

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not wrong, but it feels a bit like some tech articles you'll see which are obviously just created to fluff up a CV. I wouldn't say avyttring here is flat out wrong, just kinda... lacking.

But yeah, /boot holds "system boot loader files", sure, but that's a bit vague. It should contain your kernel and initramcpio and IIRC Grub also had its config here. That's pretty much it. I would've rather said /boot contains the kernel.

"device files" it's so vague that it's almost wrong IMO. At first glaze I would've thought that it means drivers rather than, say, "interfaces to devices"

[–] Peter1986C@lemmings.world 4 points 2 months ago

It kind of makes sense on many BIOS/UEFI-less systems where e.g. Uboot is used. And it does contain things like kernel images, sometimes initRD files etc. (which may not be bootloader files but are still system boot files).

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Well that's a shame for me. This graphic finally made the Linux file directory structure make sense to me