this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58531 readers
4201 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Their video about thumbnail A/B testing was quite interesting to see. Considering how they have dedicated designers to make these thumbnails I guess that works pretty well, despite your personal opinion on it, with which I agree too.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And that's why I have Dearrow. Bye bye bait thumbnails and titles.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Problem is that these people still get views then

[–] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People start yt channels for a lot of reason and probably the biggest reason is money. I don't really understand your fixation over yt channels only being passion project.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Especially with some channels being financially successful labors of love like Red Letter Media.

[–] thethirdobject@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

i understand even less when people are saying that when someone does something out of passion it should allow us to consume it for free

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

You have to understand shit like these thumbsnails arent made for people like you and me.

They are made for the mindless horde of sub-intellectual gremlins who are incapable of rational, independent thought. The kind that run out and put sandpaper on their windshield wipers and microwave their phones to "fast recharge" them because they saw a video that said to do that.

and the sad, terrifying reality, is these mentally stunted little goblins outnumber us by margins that are too terrifying to even think about.

[–] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

well, there are quite a lot of stupid things i did as a kid. kids just need to learn critical thinking through experience.

i would guess, that a large audience of youtube is kids: except retirees, they usually have the most free time.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why I love my username.

Cause its low hanging fruit that people who can mount no actual counter point cant resist the urge to reach for.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whether or not it's a valid counter point you continue to act superior when all you achieve is be a massive dick to people that don't mind the thumbnail or video

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Projecting a bit with that whole "Acting superior" claim, aintcha.

[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aren't you just such a smart, special, edgy boy

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Weird take, but you do you man.

[–] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, because nothing says "intellectual superiority" quite like ranting about thumbnails on the internet..

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

We should all endeavor to learn from your shining example.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

As part of the mindless horde of sub-intellectual gremlins, i have to say that while i dont love thumbnails like that, i still click on the video because i know it'll be quality

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unfortunately this is just the way it is on YT now. Post clickbait thumbnails, or miss out on hundreds of thousands of views. Because that's the way YT likes it. They don't want to positively weight long-term high-quality content, they want to promote clickbait.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the way that yields the longest combined watch time from the audience.

Do they go back and change thumbnails after a while? LTT does focus on a lot of evergreen content as well.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 3 weeks ago

That's the way that yields the longest combined watch time from the audience.

No, that would be rewarding creators with a long history of producing high quality content.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If someone cares about their view count then you shouldn’t give their content your time of day

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Quite the opposite. If they didn't care about the view count the content wouldn't exist in the first place. No one makes content with the intention of no one watching it, and they certainly don't make high quality content that requires a team of people and expensive equipment.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They make them because it’s fun/they are passionate

And that makes them higher quality

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At a bare minimum they make them because they're passionate about sharing with others. In which case they care about the view count. Once again, no one makes a video and uploads it to a video-sharing platform and doesn't care who watches it.

Having the time and money to dedicate to making high quality content makes them higher quality. If they have to work a 9-5 doing something else, and they record everything on a Galaxy S4 because they have no money, it's bound to be lower quality or just non-existent.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You need to spend more time around small channels

LTT is a good example of how what you’re saying is bullshit. All the money in the world but they’re still tech illiterate people making tech videos

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You have I have very different ideas of tech illiterate. Most of the hosts have forgotten more than I care to learn. I guess if you work very technical tech stuff 24-7 you have a higher standard.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It’s just the constant falsehoods and misleading

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

What do you mean? I've found their testing graphs especially to be very clear.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You need to spend more time around small channels

Which would tell me what, exactly?

Any you want to recommend?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

I guess it depends what you’re looking for

https://m.youtube.com/@BudgetBin/videos

If you want budget builds

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

Dude, this isn't the Youtube of 2006 anymore.

Content creating, whether for TV, Radio, or Internet is a job.