this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
3407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
1
Intel is the latest Fortune 500 giant to test the ‘4 wrong CEOs’ rule (fortune.com)
submitted 2 months ago by jerryh100@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Maybe Intel just needs a Taiwanese CEO? ; )

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

he was as a good a CEO choice as they could have made.

I'm not so sure, with the scandals of crashing Intel CPU's we have now, both their CPU line and their production is getting extremely poor PR.
I suspect Gelsinger pushed unfinished products, because he is desperate for results, and now Intel seems worse off than when he took over reputation wise. Gelsinger is losing both money and PR value on 2 fronts for Intel now.

Intel used to have a pretty stellar reputation for reliability, especially in the server market. It seems to me they have little left to build on now.