this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59601 readers
3415 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Part of the script that got cut by Hollywood was literally Switch being a different gender inside the Matrix and outside.
That's literally why they were originally named "Switch." Switch is in the original film and dies in the original film. Not the sequels.
But sure, not a trans allegory.
The part that gets said is a "trans allegory" but isn't is the red pill as a stand-in for estrogen.
I went back and looked at the articles I had read and dug a little deeper to get to an interview with Lilly Wachowski herself:
https://www.them.us/story/lilly-wachowski-mentoring-the-matrix-interview
To be honest, her statement doesn’t seem like either a denial or confirmation to me so 🤷♂️
Yeah, it sounds to me like she has issue with just that specific thing being treated as a trans allegory rather than the whole thing, the film, The Matrix, itself, as trans allegory as a whole, and the idea that it was purposeful rather than happenstance.
It sounds more like "we were closeted at the time, and we unconsciously were putting in trans allegories to our own paths and ideas" which still means its trans allegory, even if it was unintentional at the time, because they still hadn't "come out" to even themselves yet.
In other words, it's undeniably trans allegory, but perhaps that wasn't consciously on their mind at the time they wrote it.
Thanks for the link, I hadn't read that one. Definitely clears it up a little.