this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How exactly is the production of batteries cleaner and cheaper than the production of natural gas?

On to your bullshit "answer":

Mostly because natural gas is a one and done thing when it is used.

Has nothing to do with the production.

Batteries can be recycled.

Nothing to do with base production, again.

Production of natural gas is largely done through racking which destroys the groundwater. While batteries often require mining

Finally! Production!

Oh no... So apparently mining doesn't impact ground water in anyway? What about nearby rivers? Lakes?

(excluding mechanical ones), they often can be broken down and reused in new batteries.

You already said batteries can be recycled. No shit Shirlocke, doesn't make the mines have less impact.

And of course there is the greenhouse gas emissions from methane that are horrible.

What about all of the GHG to open and maintain a Lithium mine? Transport of raw Lithium to production lines? The refining of Lithium for use in batteries?

Etc. Etc.

Methane is extremely leaky. Methane usage emits about as much greenhouse gas emissions as coal does.

Yup, that is true. Doesn't mean that batteries are a "green" alternative when they do just as much damage and use a resource that is far more finite.

I enjoy that you are making a strawman. Nobody ever said batteries have no negatives. You asked how they were leaner than natural gas. I answered. Sorry that the answer hurt your feelings.

I do love how people like you always default to "sorry I hurt your feelings" like some knob who thinks I don't believe in climate change actually has an impact on my mental health and feelings.

Player one syndrome is strong with you young padawan, look into that before it gets terminal.

[–] gumnut@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

When you “mine” natural gas and burn it for heat, it’s gone. It disappears (and produces harmful GHG in the process) You have to keep doing this to get more output.

When you mine materials for batteries, you end up with a physical thing that persists, can be used over and over and can be recycled into new batteries at end of life.

This means the amount of mining required for renewables + batteries is proportional to only the addition of new capacity, whereas the amount of “mining” for fossil fuels is proportional to the total gross energy output (including significant heat losses)

We’re mining a lot of battery materials now, but that’s because we’re adding a crapload of capacity.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Health and Environmental Concerns

Despite the positive outlooks on battery recycling, negative effects also have been shown to impact developing nations that recycle batteries, especially those with lead and lithium.

Lead is a highly toxic substance, and processing it can result in pollution and contamination of people, resulting in long-term health problems and even disability.[59][33] According to one ranking, lead-acid battery recycling is, by far, the most deadly industrial process, globally, in terms of Disability-adjusted life years lost—costing between 2,000,000 and 4,800,000 estimated lost years of individual human life.[60]

Since 2015, developing nations like Vietnam have increased their battery processing capacity as global demand for batteries has grown. The process for recycling batteries often leads to toxic metals being introduced into the environment. In many of these nations, there are little protections available for workers working with the batteries.[3] In nations like Indonesia, it was reported that over a span of four years, battery recycler's blood lead levels almost doubled.[61] Lead exposure to workers can also be transmitted to family members away from work, ultimately leading to lead poisoning. [62]

More studies continue to be conducted to gather an understanding of environmental impacts. Studies show that most lithium-ion batteries contain Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). PFAS accumulates in humans and wildlife, often leading to immune and thyroid disfunctions, liver diseases, and other issues relating to homeostasis inside of the body.[63] Lead contamination of neighborhoods has resulted from the process of recycling lead batteries. In 1992, the EPA reported 29 lead-recycling sites were on the EPA's Superfund clean-up list, 22 of them on their "National Priority List."[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_recycling#Lithium_ion_batteries