this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45307 readers
67 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not a single one is communist, so what’s your point?

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No I really don’t. What is the point?
That China is highest in property ownership?
So a capitalistic dictatorship has the best metric in one area makes capitalistic dictatorships good?

Surely that can’t be it, as it’s completely retarded, so what is the point?

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah. I think you get it, even if you'd rather pretend not to. But remember, you are what you pretend to be.

[–] Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope I literally still don't get your point. Feel free to spell it out for dumdums like myself...

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, you get it. It's not hard to infer.

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why are you unwilling to enlighten us?

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because it is self evident. Pretending you don't understand is you acting in bad faith. If you actually cared about it instead of trying to bait an argument, you would be asking better questions. Instead you demand more to start a fight with and you will not get it.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally tho, what's your point? I have no idea what you're trying to say here, especially without the context of the deleted content

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I just find it neat that former and current "communist" (broad term for this) countries have a high level of home ownership. People largely like to pretend that under communism you own nothing, while in reality, nations who even for a brief period of aspiring to communism had given what were peasants who didn't own their own shirt a whole ass house and let them own it. No rent, No payment. Just supplied it.

It's neato. An interesting statistic that dispels partially the myth that (what the OP said I think, it may have been another person) that communism never built wealth for anyone. It did at times. Just not in the way we normally like to view it. The american dream to own your own home.

But I am not willing to sit and argue every minute detail of this explanation. Such as when one person said "not a single one is communist" Which while technically true, is not worth the time to discuss with someone who is just using a very common bait.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My dude they’re just here as a bad faith actor.

Don’t engage.

[–] Sciaphobia@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is this whole instance like this? Like, is this another hexbear?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

MANY of the .ml instances are like this

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

The person stonewalling is a .world user?