this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59601 readers
3415 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • YouTube is intensifying efforts to combat adblockers, including blocking video playback and warning users of potential account suspension.
  • Increased ads on YouTube have driven many users to adblockers, hurting both YouTube’s ad revenue and content creators reliant on ad-based income.
  • Despite these measures, many users are leaving YouTube or finding workarounds, leading creators to seek alternative revenue streams off-platform.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

You could pay for YouTube Premium

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Fuck that though

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's only a matter of time until the premium users get ads. Just like Netflix, and cable TV before that. You will inevitably wind up paying to be advertised to.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Netflix has ads now? I thought that was only for their lower tier service? I had to cancel Netflix cause they haven't came out with two more seasons of Stranger Things yet.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 3 months ago

yes for lower paid tiers.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

I'd pay for YouTube Premium Lite if it didn't state "Note: Ads will still show on music content and outside of videos." and if that'd make them stop harvesting all my data.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Is that what they are trying to do? Push crap ads and try to kill adblock to get a little extra user share to pay for yet another subscription?

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't care if you block ads... but to act like Google owes you and that you deserve free content is called entitled.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Google certainly acts like it owes me nothing indeed, that's why it will never be good enough to pay to watch.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Google makes enough money evading taxes already. Not gonna help them make more.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't care if you use ad blockers. I get annoyed when people publish articles like... "Google is losing the adblockers war" cause then advertisers are going to start pushing harder for Google to actually prevent adblockers entirely, which they could have done already. Thus far Google, despite issues, does quite a lot of good things... Android is the only open source OS out of Apple & Windows. Android lets you install third party app stores. Chrome (Chromium) is open source... etc.

These users writing this content don't even develop the apps to block YouTube ads. If you've ever explored the APIs by YouTube, then you'd know that Google despite pushing ads for users without blockers, is still rather friendly to third party apps.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Advertisers couldn't care less about adblockers. Advertisers don't pay if the ad is blocked.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm just glad someone is thinking of the shareholders

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I forgot... where can I get my free data center with petabytes of storage & 300TB/s fiber interconnects?

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Wait, are we acting like YouTube isn't profitable now? If I'm going to spend money on videos it'll be a content creator owner platform like Nebula

[–] towerful@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I get what you are saying, but the balance is off.
YT premium costs (edit) more than a streaming service per month.
There are no industry leading movies or series released exclusively on YouTube.
YouTubes benefits of premium is "not being delivered 'skip after 5 seconds' live streams" as an ad that will play indefinitely (or at least for hours).
Also, streaming services provide much better series discovery. Ie, find a show you like and easily discover the start of that series, then binge watch the entire series in order.
YT premium is basically a "play next" queue, 1080p, and no ads.
It doesn't (AFAIK) support creators any more. It's literally just a fee to not-be-inconvenienced, and it's not great at that

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep.. i actually looked at Subscribing. But.. It's basically mostly amateur hour and the subscription costs a huge amount.

Even worse, I don't believe creators even get revenue until they exceed sufficient subscribers. So most people are actually paying youtube to put benefit from other people's video's which they have no involvement in.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When did this change? AIUI creators got a larger cut of YouTube premium views compared to ad share.

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Not sure if its subscribers or views.. But, I tried to monitize one or two of my videos, and it wouldn't let me because I don't think I had enough views or something.