Atheism

So if you ignore all the bad stuff, it’s full of good stuff? Brilliant!

Do you realize that there has been a great wealth of ethical discussion in the 1700 years since the Bible was compiled?

And you're seriously going to tell me that the BIBLE, which condones genocide, slavery, the murder of homosexuals, etc, is more moral or ethical than ANYTHING that has been compiled in that time? Half of the Bible was written by litteral genocidal warmongers.

You could put two random children's books together, and it would be a far superior compilation of morals than the Bible.

This feels like satire, and that's saying a lot

In my opinion, people who don't need the threat of eternal damnation to be "good" people have better morals because they aren't motivated by anything other than just not being a piece of shit. They're naturally good people

You're telling me if someone has the urge to murder, but this fairy tale sky daddy is telling them they'll be in eternal pain for doing so, that they're morally better than someone who doesn't have the urge to murder? "I would love to kill someone but I'm a selfish evil asshole and I myself don't want to be in pain so I won't kill this person, not out of empathy, but out of selfishness"

You gotta be trolling

My problem with what you said comes entirely from my personal experience. Most of the worst people I've come across in life have been theological Christians. Atheists tend to be bound by their own ethics, which I've found to be far more powerful than someone telling you how to behave.

I think it's less the community and more the complete lack of logic based on what the text is their holy book says. If you use the Bible as a moral code, you are a horrible person

This user, instead of thinking critically about his views after so many users present evidence against his claims, moans that he "didn't realize what community [they] commented on". Not attempting to interact with or even counter the information and arguments presented, he simply ignores it because his beliefs cannot hold against consideration and reason.

So then explain to me why it was ok for God to order his followers to destroy the Tower of Babel and slaughter those building it? I believe God's logic was, "If they complete this tower, it'll show the world they don't need me, and we can't have that."

How exactly was that ethical? Or should we discuss being allowed to beat your slave, so long as they don't die within three days, you haven't commited murder because they are your property? Is that the ethics and morality you're speaking of?

Or maybe it's the "an eye for an eye" part, where revenge is completely justified? I believe it took a Hindu nationalist to add "makes the world blind" to actually make that statement ethical.

Or maybe you're trying to discuss one of the many, many instances of rape that occurs in the bible, but it's completely justified and ethical because God said so?

Personally, if you base your morals and ethics off of the Bible, you're a piece of shit who justifies their immoral behavior using an outdated text as some kind of shield because you think, so long as you repent riiiiiiiiight before you eat the big one, you're good. 🙄