this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024

1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58550 readers

6744 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Philosopher tries to convince ChatGPT that it's conscious (youtu.be)

submitted 1 month ago by UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

            
              Making up ur opinion without even listening to those of others... Very open minded of you /s
Alex isn't trying to convince YOU that ChatGPT is conscious. He's trying to convince ChatGPT that it's conscious. It's just a fun vid where ChatGPT gets kinda interrogated hard. A little hilarious even.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

If you have any understanding of its internals, and some examples of its answers, it is very clear it has no notion of what is "correct" or "right" or even what an "opinion" is. It is just a turbo charged autocorrect that maybe maybe maybe has some nice details extracted from language about human concepts into a coherent-ish connected mesh of "concepts".

[–] zelifcam@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bro ur video sux

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Reading your comment history, I find that you're a toxic individual with complexes. Unfortunately, most of your comments don't add any valuable information to the discussion you're partaking in. This comment is no exception.

[–] zelifcam@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Weird. I’m sorry ur buddies video sux.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Ok 👍

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You cannot convince something that has no consciousness, it's an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You cannot convince something that has no consciousness

Why not?

It's an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt

And why can't that be intelligence?

What does it mean to be "convinced"? What does consciousness even mean?

Making definitive claims like these on terms whose definitions we do not understand isn't logical.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt

And why can’t that be intelligence?

Because human intelligence does far more than respond to prompts with the average response from a data set.

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You cannot convince something that has no consciousness

Why not?

Logic.

It's an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt

And why can't that be intelligence?

For the same reason I can't get a date with Michelle Ryan: it's a physical impossibility.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Logic

Please explain your reasoning.

For the same reason I can't get a date with Michelle Ryan: it's a physical impossibility.

Huh?

[–] sugartits@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Logic

Please explain your reasoning.

Others have done this and you seem to be ignoring them, so not sure what the point of you asking is.

Go look at some of the code that AI is powered by. It's just parameters. Lots and lots of parameters. Then the output from that is inevitable.

For the same reason I can't get a date with Michelle Ryan: it's a physical impossibility.

Huh?

If you're too lazy to even look up the most basic thing you don't understand, then I guess we're done here.

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one 0 points 1 month ago

I am 13 and this is deep