this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

Lemmy

12572 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/778691

While I want to block content bots, I don't want to block useful bots like @CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world @remindme@mstdn.social. Because of this, I will block them one by one. I am sharing it here for community benefit. Any addition/removal is welcome.

  • @linkbot@lemmy.link
  • @bot@lemmit.online
  • @KensandRssBot@lemmy.kensand.net
  • @PostBot@chat.maiion.com
  • @lemmybot@lemmy.staphup.nl
  • @philly_bot@fanaticus.social

gist for programmatic use: https://gist.github.com/ismailkarsli/0c6c7aa4f70d1905adea1b30271f16f7

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iso@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are not identical much. Maybe we can assume that those who are marked as bots and share around 10-100 posts as bots.

[–] marsara9@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe. 2nd idea I've got is that if no one is replying after say 24hrs and something like 75-80% of your posts are as such and you have at least 100 such posts, you get added to the list?

Main concern I see about something like this is false positives and how someone real could end up getting blocked.

I definitely want to think on this some more but it might have some legs.

[–] iso@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think

  • flagged as bot
  • doesn't responds in n hours
  • has n numbers of posts in last n hours or overall

is sufficient to determine a user is a content aggregator bot. Bot flag is an important indicator here. Like the biggest false positive would be ban a multi-purpose bot that also has content aggregation feature.