this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

You mean twice the ram (1 gig more than the shield), 4 times the storage (32 gigs), and a better remote (chirping find my remote feature, programmable button, and less shitty volume buttons)?

Yep. Sure sounds worse considering it also supports all the same features of the chromecast 4k and AV1 decoding.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're supposedly using pretty much the same chipset. So the most important part is still underpowered, these Android boxes generally work fine even with 2-3GBs of RAM.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

From OP article

such as a processor that’s 22 percent faster

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

It's also twice the price of the Onn 4k Pro (Walmart house brand) that's built on the same chip and has the same features running the stock Google TV experience.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My Chromecast has no storage and no remote. It's fine.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

Until services stop supporting it.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

until they decide that their new device needs more sales, so they depricate the protocol and you can't use it anymore

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Deprecate the casting protocol? Sure Jan. The new device still supports casting.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

That's the only reason I had to replace my previous 2 steaming devices.

The streaming backend got updated and the app in my device no longer supported it. And there was no updated app made available for that device.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

You haven't been paying attention to Google in the last few years, have you?

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Chromecast ultras are already broken if you try to use your own DNS.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

None of which changes the fact that it's more expensive and clunkier, and none of which feels necessary.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can get an Ethernet adapter for the Chromecast

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, exactly. You needed to buy an extra adapter before. Now you don't.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes! I hadn't seen that highlighted anywhere in articles really, only saw it on the damn Google Store after looking just now.

Seems an all around solid update on the previous device.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Just gotta stick FLauncher, SmartTube, Jellyfin, and Stremio on it and it seems solid.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 0 points 3 months ago

I just hope this is still possible on the new one, I can see a future where they make it impossible but hopefully not yet.

I agree that it's a good upgrade too, the only dowside is that it's not portable anymore, I used to take it with me on any travel to have my own home theater set up like I like it with me when I was living in Hotels and AirBnB's for a year on business travel. Especially in Asia the TVs are in the local language and I never have any idea how to change the language from Korean or Japanese to English so I can use the TV. But putting in the dongle and turning on the TV was always possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] moody@lemmings.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Most of the appeal of the Chromecast is that it's a dongle you plug in once and never have to see again. It doesn't need high performance and 32 gigs of RAM. It needs to play video. That's its entire purpose. It's controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn't need a remote.

For most users, this is an expensive downgrade.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

It's controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn't need a remote.

Or you can use it's remote and not need to use your phone for absolutely every little thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] variants@possumpat.io 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't need any of that. I just need a cheap dongle that can run one app

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

The dongle still works. They reached market saturation with people who just want a dongle. They can't realistically be expected to produce these forever.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So when the current dongle breaks and you just want another, what do you buy?

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Facebook market place in my small town has dozens of these for less than $20. Why don't you pick up a few of these and recycle our current supply instead of asking companies to produce more e waste incase we someday want to buy it.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The large used market exists because Google has been producing them. When Google stops producing them, that supply will dry up.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Regular Chromecast work perfectly as YouTube jukebox.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean regular Chromecast?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean regular Chromecast?

Just regular Chromecast, not that Google TV stuff. That round dongle that does nothing but accept casting streams via that cast button in many Android apps.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So the one from 2013? Sure. It was fine for that. This is a different thing, as not every device, service, or whatever supports casting. I wish they did, but they don't.

Secondarily, I don't want to use a screen to control a screen. I prefer a physical remote that I can have muscle memory for.

But I get why people liked the device. I did too. But fortunately or unfortunately, it's been 10 years and technology has moved. Which is probably why they are giving this a new name being an generally good upgrade on the last Chromecast 4K.

Christ, this one even has a built in Ethernet port and doesn't put strain on my HDMI port by just dangling there.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I have a smart TV and would appreciate some faster processing in there. Or if I can flash a simplified ROM, but dunno if those exist. As long as I get control over what it does, I'd take it. Can just Velcro it on the back of the TV so it's invisible.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I have a smart TV as well, but refuse to connect it directly to wifi. As I tried that when I bought it and it insta-bricked itself and had to go through the hassle of returning a delivered TV.

A custom ROM for this device would be interesting. I know that the Chromecast 4K can do a custom ROM, but only if it was running an older os version before you flash it, as the bootloader couldn't be unlocked after.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So the one from 2013? Sure. It was fine for that. This is a different thing, as not every device, service, or whatever supports casting. I wish they did, but they don’t.

Well, the story is about Google ending that line of products.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

With a direct successor product that contains all the same features as the last Chromecast device. If you are mourning the loss of the casting only Chromecast, that died long ago production-wise.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

If you are mourning the loss of the casting only Chromecast, that died long ago production-wise.

Late 2022 is not long ago.

load more comments (4 replies)