this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called "Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji".

F that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)

We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji. These are also brands that are heavily ingrained in our culture. Probably even more so than Bitcoin.

Or we accept that brands like Bitcoin shouldn’t use emoji as a marketing tool.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Bitcoin is digital money. A better analogy would be to campaign for a USD, Yen, euro or British pound emoji.

Oh wait, they already exist.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#Faulty_Comparison

The existence of other emoji can’t justify the inclusion of a new emoji. Those emojis are old, and it’s unlikely they would’ve been approved under Unicode’s current guidelines.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you.

I'm not really arguing for a bitcoin emoji. Just against the McDonald's brand comparison.

BTC is not mainstream enough (and never will be) to be needed in everyday text speak.

[–] poo@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

The coin itself is not a scam.

However, its main usage is to receive payments from scams or any other kind of computer-related crime really.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Except those are real currencies the world recognizes.

Most businesses will tell you to fuck off if you try to pay them in bitcoin.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most businesses will tell you to fuck off if you try to pay them in bitcoin.

Yes and no. You can indirectly pay for things in Bitcoin using a Bitcoin credit card. Although I'm not sure why you would want to.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

It's not "paying in bitcoin" if you have a random third party on your side converting it to a currency that isn't a joke.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Probably even more so

probably? shitcoin isn't even in the same ~~ballpark~~ universe as something like McDonald's or Pepsi.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah McDonalds is based on torturing and murdering animals while destroying the planet.... While bitcoin is only destroying the planet like the rest of capitalism.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

vegans stay on topic challenge (impossible)

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

🍟 <<< Only one brand sells French fries / Chips in this format. And it's the super-size format.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unicode Consortium decide which emoji should be included. It’s up to each vendor themselves to come up with how they should look like. I don’t think Unicode Consortium explicitly state it must look like McDonald’s fries.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No. But the description of the Emoji is French Fries in a red carton.

Now I can't be absolutely certain only McDonald's sells french fries in a red carton, nor do I know if red french fry cartons are trademarked (answers to these questions evaded simple websearches) but I have never seen french fries sold in red cartons outside of McDonald's.

If you do find non-McDonald's french fries sold in a red carton, please point them out.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago

Red carton is chosen because that’s how it’s commonly depicted in cartoon images.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=french+fries+cartoon&t=h_&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At KFC they’re in a red plastic box of the same format. Can’t buy them cuz of reusable packaging laws in France, but that’s what I thought first when I saw this emoji

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

That's fair. I had forgotten KFC made their own version of fries and boxed them in red.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji

bitcoin is not a company.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Also not a brand, in the trademark sense

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

These are not public infrastructure

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

yes, it is. anyone can spin up a node or download the blockchain or make an address.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Should the fediverse get an emoji? How about Matrix?

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

as was already said elsewhere, advocating for an emoji is silly, and advocating against one might be sillier.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Putting significant energy into campaigning against it? Sure. But what's silly about saying "this is a stupid idea and shouldn't happen"?

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

that blog post and petition are significantly more than just saying it's stupid

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You know the petition is to get bitcoin an emoji right? It's not a petition to stop those campaigning for a bitcoin emoji

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

do you know how I know that you didn't read the article?

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Anyone can shit their pants. Is that "infrastructure"?

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You think you can fool people by using a simple straw man argument technique? Come on, get your shit together. Bitcoin is infrastructure as anyone can submit transactions to the network and they will be seamlessly processed. As simple as that

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know that shouting "straw man!" is the first step of trying to deflect from being wrong on the Internet... But if you're going to do it, at least know what a straw man is.

My argument is that "Infrastructure" != "anyone can do it".

Infrastructure is something that benefits and maintains the general public. Bitcoin benefits a handful of cryptobros, billionaires... and most importantly ransomware rings.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Your straw man is "shit in their pants"

Read your own comments dude

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The person I was arguing with was saying that "infrastructure is anything which is something anyone can do". I gave an example of something that anyone can do which isn't infrastructure.

It's absolutely a direct refuation


a counter-example which disproves their original statement. It's not a "straw man", as much as you get mad and scream that it is.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 3 months ago

So you were wrong from the beginning. He never said "infrastructure is anything which is something anyone can do". You are the only one who said it. He provided an example of a service provided by the infrastructure in question

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

the sewer is infrastructure. i don't think you understand the network protocol.

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not using the sewer when I shit my pants. I don't think you understand pants.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

maybe you should use the public infrastructure.

[–] Aolley@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Since when is Bitcoin a brand lmao? I'm really struggling to see how it is comparable to McDonald's or Windows. Having a logo does not make you a corporation

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago

The Bitcoin logo is the brand. Corporations like exchanges use this brand to market their services.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Bitcoin is a network protocol. not a brand.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The logo and name is the brand. How do you visually represent a specific payment protocol without using its logo? There’s no emoji for HTTP or TCP.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 0 points 3 months ago

I'm actually for the idea of emojis for protocols. Not Bitcoin specifically because I don't think it has long term potential as a deflationary virual asset, but block chain? Sure.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

while there may not be an emoji for http, maybe there should be. there is sort of an unofficial one (a broken lock), and there are other protocols that have logos. as another commenter said, it's kind of silly to fight for an emojii for it, and probably sillier to fight against it.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

while there may not be an emoji for http, maybe there should be.

No God, Please No!

We don't need another gzip or bzip2 logo. Lol

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nobody is saying Bitcoin to refer to that, ever. Come on.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

maybe no one you talk to, but I assure you, it happens. it is happening right now, in this conversation