this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Car dependency is a dead end. It's inherently wasteful, privileged, inefficient, unsustainable, unhealthy, etc. I would much rather have free, extensive, public transit and safe infrastructure for pedestrians, bikes, and light EVs.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Building out transit and infrastructure takes time. In the meanwhile, people still have to get places.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

And isn't necessarily the best approach

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago

I don't think anyone is suggesting otherwise, but continuing to say that as a reason not to work towards that goal makes no sense

[–] firadin@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Great, lmk when there's a regular train from Boston to my office in Boxborough, which currently requires it's residents to drop off their own trash at the facility. I'm sure that'll be frequent and efficient right?

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Tell us you don't live in the US without telling us you don 't live in the US.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago

I live in the U.S. That comment is 100% true, no matter where one lives.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or anywhere relatively rural. I just got home from a long weekend in rural Minnesota/Wisconsin, and there's literally no viable way to run public transit out there in a manner that wouldn't either be so restrictive as to be useless, or would lose so much money it would be first on the block for service cuts (and therefore become useless). I'm talking "town of 600 residents, most people live on unincorporated county land on a farmstead, and the only grocery store in a 50 mile radius is a Dollar General" rural. Asking these folks to give up cars is an insane prospect.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago

Paved roads don't just naturally occur, though. That lifestyle is already an insane prospect, unsustainabke but for the large tax subsidy required to enable it.