this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
488 points (84.4% liked)

Bisexual

1445 readers
3 users here now

This is a community for bisexuals, their allies, friends, family, anyone curious about us or our community, or just people who want to hang out.

Bisexual means different things to different people, and I'm not going to tell you what it should mean to you. But one thing I will say is that being bisexual does NOT mean being trans-exclusionary. We love no matter what dingles, dongles, or dangles you do or do not have in your pants.

Of course, there are the basic rules. No hate speech, no brigading, no doxing, no homophobia, no transphobia, no sexism, no racism, no illegal material. Rules will be added as needed.

At the moment, we do not have a hard and fast rule over NSFW images or posts, but I will say that this is a community about bisexuality, not for porn. Please don't make me ban NSFW content altogether.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I reported them for harassment with the following statement:

The purpose of this group is to review bomb any game that has gay representation. Their discussion threads talk about using other platforms to discriminate against LGBTQ+ communities and individuals to circumvent Steam's TOS policies. This type of behavior promotes discrimination, review brigading, and toxicity. It is surprising Steam is tolerating such open homophobia on this platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Why are they getting away with it?

Established culture, critical mass, and platform ownership.

Steam is an online platform owned by Valve. They have ToS and a Code of Conduct. Those are published, announced baselines you can compare and report against.

Churches are not all the same, and are generally not on a platform with authority you report them to.

You're asking for public shaming. Which can and does [sometimes] happen as bad press, protests, and prosecutions. But generally, it's more difficult and higher risk in the real-life public, and less likely to succeed given their established nature.