this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58513 readers
5760 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The United State only wants American companies to spy on Americans.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think most countries spy on their citizens and a lot of the same countries probably don't want other countries doing the same due to possible unwanted intel leaks in government and corporate sectors.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I think most countries spy on their citizens

we should not be OK with that

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I'm certainly not OK with it.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not saying it is okay. Pointing out that even if hypocritical there's generally a strategic reason for countries to deter international spying. Would be quite a puzzling decision for any country to provide an open door for other countries to spy on them.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What makes you think this'll deter international spying?

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Trying to set barriers seems logical when it comes to outsiders. But, spying by its nature is constant attempts to sneak past barriers, so attempts aren't going to stop. It'd just be called collaboration instead of spying if information was shared freely and spying would be unnecessary.

Maybe we have a different definition of deter. I don't see it as stop, but trying to make it less easier. Why would spies stop trying to spy? I don't expect that number to change. If it did that would be some pitiful spies.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago

It’d just be called collaboration instead of spying

Happens all the time, the NSA can't spy on US citizens to it asks GCHQ to do it for them, and vice-versa.

Kaspersky's software had been known for flagging US 3-letter-agencies' malware, so there's that...

[–] Maddier1993@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago

On the other hand if the number keeps going down it helps strengthen hope that it can go down to 0. When these things happen some apparatus gets left behind on how to do it a again for rogue actors inside the country too.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

NSA? Notice how fast the Trump shooter's phone was access? Gotta have those backdoors for spying.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

The funny thing is, that whole thing just proved that the spying didn't work. Trump was still almost killed. So the spying and mass surveillance did still not prevent that.

I guess they should stop violating everybody's privacy, but obviously they don't care.