Asklemmy

43945 readers

638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

164

What occupation requires the most education/training only to be very low paid? (lemm.ee)

submitted 4 months ago by Cap@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Teachers for sure. Highly educated people providing a service that's absolutely crucial for everybody and they're paid like shit even before you consider the number of out-of-work hours they end up working.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's the worst of all angles... Professions where the professional loves the work and wants to do the work no matter what get exploited more than most AND with public school teachers, they're stuck with taxpayer decided budgets....

As far as America goes: I WANT EVERYTHING AND I DON'T WANT TO PAY TAXES FOR IT!

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We could take away Elon Musks obscene wealth, leave him with enough to experience no material change in quality of life, and pay every other american who isn't him $7,000k. And he's just one of 735 billionaires. We could tax the shit out of these people and neither they nor us would notice a difference at time, but then when it was time to provide social benefits from government programs, everyone would notice "wow. Doesn't this country work so much better? Look at all the things we can fund!"

[–] walden 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

$7,000k? Is that $7,000 or $7,000,000? 7,000 thousand?

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I meant to put $7k

[–] walden 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That makes sense.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

I don't type good sometimes when I'm on the go and I make things redundant. In this case it even changed the meaning. I tried to go edit my comment but I got back a 500 error