this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Memes
45745 readers
104 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It is kind of amazing how even those disenfranchised voters will rally to support the hegemony of the “two party” corporatist rule. I suggested recently we could consider rallying behind a single issue 3rd party candidate who would end the legalized bribes and replace FPTP with a more democratic alternative, and was immediately downvoted and told it’s not possible due to FPTP.
facepalm
In order for a 3rd option to be viable, the entire system must change. I'm not holding my breath.
Between now and then, all we can do is vote for the less bad of two evils.
The problem is, yes its its theoreticaly possible, but praticaly speaking it would be near impossible.
Theoretically, you need to get 51% of the population all vote for one person. However, with FPTP, you get one choice on the ballot. Is the average voter going to risk their vote on a 3rd party, or vote for who they belive to be the "lesser evil" of the two that have a shot at winning.
Even if you do manage to get 51%, there's the electoral collage. Never forget, our democracy has built-in the ability to overwrite the presidential vote.
Your first hurdle is getting any one to name an independent candidate.