this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59651 readers
2643 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
it's a euphemism for "And You Are Lynching Negroes" - that's literally what people used to say instead of whataboutism.
It's not the name of any logical fallacy. You're thinking of Tu Quoque.
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2022/03/is-whataboutism-always-a-bad-thing
Hahahahahahahaha, oh man, how much you spend on a psychologist every month?
Also, what you're doing is called sophistry, specifically moving the goal posts (which predates the US by about 1000 years).
You should probably educate yourself lest you expose the clown inside.
Free Palestine
What an effortless Troll
The other guy was saying I put in too much effort. Can't please you libs
I can think of ways you could please me 🚀🤤
It's funny how much effort you're going to debating my word choice instead of the meaning and content of my rebuttal to your stupid comment. Do you have an actual point here? Are you claiming that what you were doing above wasn't whataboutism? That it's somehow a valid counterpoint to my joke about CCP censorship to say that the US also does bad things?
Your rebuttal was nothing more than a word choice. And you're still using it.
The reason you're doing this is because if you use the actual fallacy's name, rather than the US empire's "and you are lynching negros", you're more likely to see your error.
lol who do you think was saying this, and how is "whataboutism" in any way of a euphemism for it? Did you even bother to read the article you linked?
America dropped "you are lynching negros" in favor of "whataboutism" because it made people think for a moment, hey, why are we lynching negros after all? Aren't we kinda hypocrites?
America didn't drop anything because they weren't saying it in the first place, the Soviets were. America also aren't the ones that coined a new phrase for it, British royalists were, who probably had no knowledge of the Russian phrase. All of this was explained in the article you linked.