this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59771 readers
3935 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So OpenAI is next to stop using those too?

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Wouldn't the attacks on openai be the same as these ones. Like if I was large media company wouldn't I want my media to be vilifying AI because its the same principal and mechanism as training AI. They can kill two birds

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

No. That would involve the general public maintaining a consistent position.

I want knowledge to be free. That means free. That means governments, businesses, NGOs, your local church sewing circle, AIs/LLMs, refugees living in tents, convicts, children, and any other humans or human organizations or anything humans built.

I am willing to accept a LIMITED duration copyright and patent and private science publication system if it could be reformed such that it the brains behind it were paid and couldn't legally sign away their compensation. Given that we as a society aren't willing to build this the best course of action is to actively work to break copyright