this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59755 readers
3805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

We live in a system that actively prevents humans to get more knowledge, go figure.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We live in a system that monetizes everything, then seeks to restrict access to those things in order to profit.

Knowledge is just one casualty.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Scarcity is money and if there is no scarcity laws will be bought to to artificially create said scarcity.

[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

No one is preventing you from visiting a library, which would be a fesible alternative.

However, not a simple solution for everyone in every country. Knowlegde should be a free and shared common good.

No one is preventing you from visiting a library, which would be a fesible alternative.

actually blatantly wrong, public libraries are slowly dying and losing funding.

[–] 01011@monero.town 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

That depends on where you live. The Internet Archive is far more accessible than a good library, for much of the global populace.

And my library doesn't have every book I want to read.

[–] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That depends on where you live.

Yes, I know. That's why I said:

However, not a simple solution for everyone in every country.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

It's not even limited by country. There are far too many places in well resourced countries that don't have access to good (or any) libraries.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

~~He's also a corrupt cop, but I repeat myself.~~

Meant to reply to the comment above yours.

[–] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, except scumbags like eric adams, NYC's bought-owned-and-operated-by-real-estate-interests mayor.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

He's also a corrupt cop, but I repeat myself.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Libraries where good for before the XXI century. Nowadays the amount of content they had is pretty small. Most libraries don't really has anything but the more famous books.

[–] Akrenion@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They became community hubs that offer more than just books. Even ebooks albeit that being weirdly capped by publishers as well.

They do much more than public opinion would make you believe.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

True, but that doesn't change the fact that specific books can be hard to find. Libraries are great, but they don't solve the problem IA solves.

[–] Akrenion@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago

We got a nationwide network of specific books. You can order books to your local library if you are a little patient. They might not have a lot of selfpublished books but that is a problem of scale and negotiating power of publishers.