this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Why wouldn't high income areas be more expensive to serve?

Don't they have to have local servers all around the world to even allow this instant-like transfer of videos for anyone to watch at anytime?

I actually don't know the back end stuff so you might be able to explain this part.

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but for companies like Google, the vast majority of systems administration and SRE work is done over the Internet from wherever staff are, not by someone locally (excluding things like physical rack installation or pulling fibre, which is a minority of total effort). And generally the costs of bandwidth and installing hardware is higher in places with a smaller tech industry. For example, when Google on-sells their compute services through GCP (which are likely proportional to costs) they charge about 20% more for an n1-highcpu-2 instance in Mumbai than in Oregon, US.

[–] Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

Would you say its unfair to base pricing on any attribute of your customer/customer base? I haven't seen much discussion around how to fairly set prices for any kind of service/good. Seems most people agree they should make a profit of some kind, and I've heard some rough rules suggested but it almost seems like the logical conclusion is that prioritizing profit is always bad for society.