this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61263 readers
3783 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
2
US sues Adobe for ‘deceiving’ subscriptions that are too hard to cancel | The Justice Department alleges that Adobe hid early cancellation fees and trapped consumers in pricey subscriptions (www.theverge.com)
submitted 7 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 0 points 7 months ago

I’m curious about this. If demonstrable, many could sue for damages.

For these government websites, what is the typical user workflow?

  1. An embedded Adobe applet (e.g. fill, sign, and submit on the government website)
  2. Token-based API (e.g. redirect or spawn child window/tab, user fills and signs on adobe site, user returned to government site).
  3. Something else, such as a document upload button with server-side validation for digital signing?