this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59626 readers
3001 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Mozilla has reinstated previously banned Firefox add-ons in Russia that were designed to circumvent state censorship, such as a VPN and a tool to access Tor websites.
  • The ban was initially imposed at the request of Russia's internet censorship agency, Roskomnadzor, but Mozilla lifted it to support an open and accessible internet.
  • Mozilla's decision reflects its commitment to users in Russia and globally, despite the potential risks associated with the regulatory environment in Russia.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I'm wondering where all the people that filled the other threads complaining about how Mozilla was evil and "enshittifying" are, now.

There's nothing to be outraged about, so I guess not here.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago

Let them be on the wrong side of history lol I simply do not understand people who go out of their way to attack Mozilla/firefox. It’s baffling.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I was one, I'll admit it and I'm glad I was wrong

As far as why? Because FF/Mozilla positions themselves as THE browser for privacy and "For the people", but Mozilla is also a for-profit company so I'm always expecting the worst out of them just like I have for so many other for-profit companies

Just look at Canonical, they're pursuing an IPO RN and are already in the early stages of enshittification because of it.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago

Canonical has been in the early stages of enshittification for a dozen years.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Mozilla is a non profit organisation.

You're basically mad because you're misinformed, not because of reality.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They're both; Mozilla Foundation, the non-profit org, is the parent of Mozilla Corporation, the for-profit organization I'm talking about.

Mozilla Corporation is in charge of distribution of the official download and development coordination and some other things. Now the Foundation is in charge over them admittedly, but I see that as a bit like playing with fire.

I wouldn't say mad, more...just prepared for the worst

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, the sole idea that they accepted this in the first place is a pretty bad sign.. anyway, firefox is still the best option we have

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

They...didn't. As they said, and keeps getting repeated over and over here, they temporarily disabled it while they figured out their options. I'm guessing involving lawyers.

Then they decided.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe those expressions had a part in Mozilla's reversal?

What are you taking a victory lap for exactly?

If anything, a small victory lap is for all those people you sound smug about.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah, so one of those people did show up.

[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're right, I should know better.

[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Whatever helps you sleep at night

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I was one too. Glad they caved to the criticisms and reinstated the extension. It doesn't absolve them of removing it in the first place and trying to pull a sneaky, but at least they listened.

Where are we now? Well wherever we are it sounds like us internet moaners stay winning.

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's one way of viewing it i guess. My guess would have been that an organization like Mozilla has to make sure what the consequences are for not complying, and after they figured out there was no real danger they did the right thing.

It's easy to say they should always do the right thing, but they have to keep in mind their own safety, and that of their project too, it's not an easy thing to balance.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I don't think the Russian government would literally send hundreds of assassins abroad to kill everyone associated with the project and DDOS their website and whatnot for not complying with an internet censorship request but I see your point

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

Who's talking about abroad? Maybe they have peoplke in russia working on the project and they need to check their safety?

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

God, I hate fanboyism. Maybe, maybe the criticism was warranted? idk just a thought. If someone fucks up everyone can point it out. Of course there are always people who will defend no matter what…

Now we can say see they corrected some of their mistakes