this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58550 readers
6877 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Patrick Breyer, a staunch defender of digital rights, laments the Pirate Party’s exit from the EU Parliament as a blow to online privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I was considering voting for the pirate party, but they polled at less than 5% in France and it was not a useful vote, which was evidently needed.

[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I still voted for them, because I could.

And I'm sick of the useful vote thing, I did it last time in 2022 against Le Pen and all I got was a lousy President.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Better a lousy president than a fascist

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

…are you sure? Le Pen is going to become president anyway on June 30th.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No she isn't? Macron is president until the next French presidential election in 2027.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Prolly their confusion is that Macron called for new elections, but unlike some parliamentary governments Macron isn’t selected by parliament.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Don't expect a Le Pencil supporter to understand reason.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Strategic voting is what you're stuck doing depending on your local electoral process.

She's going to become president in 2024, she should have become president in 2022 instead.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If a party won't fix the serious issue to let me also vote for who I want, they're not entitled to my vote.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You can deny the reality of the electoral system you're stuckwith all you want, at the end of the day you're probably one of the people that will end up suffering the most because of it.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Voting for a party I don't want is also suffering, though I doubt you'd believe that. Keeping the main parties in power via a rigged system ain't ending this cycle of 22 cycle.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know who's worse, the person making people suffer or the person who could have prevented it doing nothing out of principle?

Because that's exactly what people are doing by letting the right win by refusing to be strategic. Your opponent will 100% act strategically.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is my hope that greater political diversity will prevent more suffering in the long run by governments better representing the people.

It's very comfortable to blame others if your political opponents get into power. If you don't have another suggestion I can at least leave you with the small comfort that this bad person won't vote for the main party you dislike the most out of spite.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok so let people suffer now to prevent suffering in the future?

How many people?

For how long in the future are we looking?

You think as an opponent to Le Pen you're not one of those who will suffer?

I'm starting to believe that the Russian trolls are now focusing on the French election.

Tu parles français au moins?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lucky for you I'm not French. I just oppose tactical voting in favor of voting in someone who may have a chance of removing the need for tactical voting.

I don't know how long it will take and I don't know which paths actually leads to the least amount of suffered in the short term. I just know it needs to change.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

Have fun dealing with your fascist government, I hope you'll remember these comments while you're being repressed.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

both macron and lepen are two corrupted fascists tricking you like a chicken into choosing a side and voting for them instead of "wasting your vote"

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

And I was right to; pirate party got less than 1% of votes, also due to the fact they couldn't afford to have their voting paper in most places.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 4 months ago

Thanks for being part of the self-fulfilling prophecy, I guess.

[–] manucode@infosec.pub 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Where do you live that you can print your own ballot?

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

France. The parties have to pay the government if they want their ballot already present at the election place. As a citizen, you may also bring any ballot you want (within some very reasonable rules), so the smaller parties instruct you to print your own to save on costs.

[–] manucode@infosec.pub 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

OMG. Here in Germany you sometimes get an entire booklet of ballot papers, if necessary. You wouldn't even be allowed to bring your own ballot. Otherwise, one could secretly mark their own ballot in some way, thereby undermining the secrecy of the vote.

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, this is one of the seasons the Pirate party is pushing for a unique ballot, because the current format is really unfavorable towards small parties that don't have the means to print the ballots among other things

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Polls are problematic in that they reinforce their own predictions. It's especially frustrating in recent years when you're bombarded with them even when there's no election in sight. Problem is, governing parties are usually busy governing while populists are campaigning 24/7. Media has made a huge effort to reinforce the trend and get people used to living in a far right era. Polls are unhelpful and destort democracy to a dangerous degree.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the greens had a risk of not getting 5% so it was much more worthwhile to vote for them.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You should be able to vote for both.. 😮‍💨

[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

There may be even better voting systems but 3-2-1 would be a nice change. This way strategic voting gets at least somewhat mitigated and might force people to actually invest some time and look at the agenda of some other parties too because they have to vote for 3 parties.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I'd much rather vote for a party that aligns with my values but might not get a seat, in hopes it will inspire more people to do so next time around.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Vote your conscience while you can. I'm pretty much stuck voting for slightly left of center candidates (in the US) because the opposition is to the right of Kim Jong Un depending on the issue.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I would have voted for the Pirate Party if there was a ballot for them.

Didn't print it beforehand so I couldn't.

Last time I printed my own ballot they just didn't count it and my vote was considered invalid. Even though I had the exact size required by regulations...

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Wait, am I missing something here? Are there countries where you don't have all options on the ballot, or at least an empty space?

Edit: Saw your explanation in another comment. Wouldn't having to bring your own ballot also invalidate voting secrecy, since bringing your own indicates that you most likely intent to vote for an unlisted party (and, in reverse, anyone using the regular ballot voting for a party that's listed)?

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 0 points 3 months ago

It affects secrecy a bit but you still have to take at least two different ballots into the voting booth. Obviously you are bringing your own ballot and taking one already printed so it's not really a secret.

Also there was taped garbage bags in the voting booth so that people can throw away their discarded ballots but that's also a great way to show what every else has been voting before me...

I still think our voting system is quite ok but there are definitely flaws.

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

Concerning your edit, not sure about other countries, but I can speak about the process in France.

We get (normally) ballots with the programs in the mail before the elections, so we can also bring ballots from there. Then the way it works when voting is

  • there's a table with ballots from all lists that provided them (so missing the ones we're talking about here) and you can take any number of them
  • then you go isolate in a cabin where you put the ballot you want, or nothing, inside an envelope
  • finally your identity is verified, your vote is counted and you put your envelope in a transparent box

So there's not really a way to definitely know you're voting for an unlisted candidate here.