this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
371 points (93.6% liked)
Linux
48364 readers
1314 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ew Flatpak. Feels like an OS inside an OS. And it also feels bloated. Like almost one GB just to install an emulator.
The quoted storage figures for Flatpaks are misleading. They don't use that much. I have 50+ Flatpaks installed and they use barely more than 2.4GB.
And Flatpaks are great. There's nothing to ew at.
Are you sure they are using 2.4 GiB? because that's nowhere near what I've gotten: https://imgur.com/MjExYMB (notice flatpak-dedup-checker is being used)
EDIT:
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/994
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1651
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/46
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak.github.io/issues/191
Their numbers sound questionable, but if you weren’t pulling in KDE yours would be significantly lower too.
The whole plasma DE meta package on arch is 1.1 GiB. It will be lower indeed but I don't think it is that significant? (Unless flatpak has a surprise here lol)
edit: iirc the app that really blew the overall size in that screenshot was libreoffice btw.
you want your application to work everywhere, that's why flatpak is needed, no one complains about nix, when they have the same principle, flatpak is just more distro-agnostic and with a more powerful sandbox
It's actually more than it, you can get to the point of having something like several different OS inside the OS because it might start having several different versions of big dependencies like mesa.